Levelr Free levelling lane Runs in this tab · nothing uploaded

Bid levelling

Two priced bills.
One levelled comparison.

Drop in two contractors' priced bills of quantities. Levelr pairs them line by line, tests the quantities the bidders measured against each other, works out a defensible rate reference, and ranks what is worth querying by the money at stake. Levelling consultant fee proposals instead?

Nothing here is uploaded and nothing is saved.

The whole comparison runs inside this browser tab. There is no account, no storage, and no analytics — not even a count. Close the tab and it is gone. The only thing this page ever loads is its own code, from its own address, and if you drop a PDF it fetches the reader for it the same way; your bill is not part of that request and could not be, because this page forbids the browser from opening a connection anywhere at all. Said before you paste anything, because a page that lets you work a live tender and then reveals a wall has taken a hostage, not offered a trial.

01The two bids

Reading thisTwo contractors' priced bills, side by side. They do not need the same wording, the same order, or the same number of lines — pairing them is the job. Paste the rows, drop a CSV, or drop the PDF the contractor actually sent you.

Bidder A

Paste CSV, or drop a .csv or .pdf bill here. A PDF is read in this tab and turned into the rows below, so you can see and correct exactly what was read before anything is levelled.

Bidder B

Same shape. The two bills do not have to be in the same order or use the same wording.

Your files stay in this tab. Nothing is sent anywhere.

06How often this gets it wrong

Reading thisHow often the pairing above misses a line the two bills actually shared. Every tool that does this job gets some of them wrong; almost none of them will tell you the number. This one is measured on a real tender, checked by hand, and printed on a public page where anyone can hold us to it.

Measured, not asserted

—

The number is not the claim. Anything that pairs two bills will miss some of them; what almost nothing in this market does is count the misses and print the total. That is the whole of it — this does not pretend to be error-free, it keeps score, publishes the score, and marks the lines it is unsure about instead of presenting a guess as a finding.

07Where this stops, and what is behind the account

Reading thisWhat this free page deliberately does not do, and why. Everything on the list needs somewhere to keep things — a saved tender, a record of who changed what, a file you can send a contractor — and somewhere to keep things needs an account. It is listed here rather than discovered after you have done an afternoon's work.

Stated up front, not discovered later

  • No rate library. The bidders are checked against each other and nothing else. There is no cost book on this page and there never will be — it holds real project rates that belong to the client who paid for them.
  • Two bidders is the floor, and it is a real limit. With only two bills there is no way to tell a cheap bid from a mistaken one: a single very low rate simply becomes the reference and makes the other bidder look expensive. A third bid, or a benchmark, is what settles it.
  • No saving, no resuming, no sharing. Nothing is stored, so there is nothing to come back to, invite a colleague into, or hand to a validator.
  • No paper. The levelling schedule, both query schedules and the recommendation are drawn above on your own numbers, and they stay on this screen. There is nothing to download, and no file to send a contractor — which is the thing a query schedule exists to be. A document you can issue, and a record of who answered it, is what the account is.
  • No audit trail. Every adjustment in a levelling schedule needs a source, a method and a date behind it. That needs a record, and a record needs an account.
  • No technical scoring, so no recommendation. A most-economically-advantageous award is a technical score and a price score combined at a ratio fixed before the bids were opened. This page has the price half and none of the rest, so the recommendation above renders its technical half empty and refuses to produce a number. Scoring price alone and calling it a recommendation is the failure the product exists to prevent.
  • Levelling adjustments here have no independent estimate behind them. A real levelling schedule sources each adjustment from a quantity surveyor's estimate or a rate library, and neither is on this page. Where an adjustment can only come from the other bidder's own price, the schedule says so; where it cannot be sourced at all, the row is shown empty and counted rather than filled in with a guess.
  • No arithmetic checks and no cross-document reading. Those read across a whole tender and the documents behind it, not two spreadsheets.

None of it is withheld to make a point. Each one is a thing that cannot exist without a place to store it and a record of who did it — and that is the whole of what an account buys.